Skip to main content

Is the Welcome Mat Gone from the HSBC Conveyancing Panel?

By
Two years after complaints from customers and lawyers forced HSBC to ditch its controversial plan to drastically reduce their conveyancing panel, confusion reigns as to whether the lender's panel is, in fact, now closed regardless of whether a firm is accredited by the Law Society's Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS).

Recall, HSBC relented and allowed all members of the CQS to act for it and the borrower in the legal work needed to buy a property. The decision increased the number of firms that consumers can choose from to more than 2,500 lawyers.

The question on whether HSBC's door is shut to additional solicitors was raised by Council for Licensed Conveyancers CEO Sheila Kumar.  On whether the HSBC conveyancing panel is closed to non-CQS firms, she said:

"We've been in very detailed conversations with the HSBC around the messaging and perception of what's being said.  The clear message that we've got is that their panel is closed at the moment, because actually, they've got enough people.  It's not closed, just because of CQS or not CQS.  It's actually that they are not looking for anything.  Our conversation with them has been, that, because we are aware of the fact that there have been some messages at some levels, about if we open the panel again it will only be open to people who have got CQS behind them"

Meanwhile, I have spoken to firms who have been advised that the HSBC conveyancing panel is open. That point was made at the same CLC webinar where Kumar made her comments, as one of the delegates said he'd received a letter also confirming the panel is open.

Neither the CQS or HSBC have made any public comment on whether the HSBC conveyancing panel is open or closed.

We anxiously await some resolution.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more