Skip to main content

Managing Conveyancing Risk? Embracing Change.

Most of my meetings with conveyancing partners or compliance officers centers on one big, game-changing question: “What is the one thing that we can do to make a real difference to avoid a claim?”

They are quick to acknowledge that there is room for risk mitigation and recognise that it is an almost-impossible task to keep up to date with lender requirements without the assistance of technologies such as COMPLETIONmonitor. Who in the world of conveyancing does not recognise that it has become a more complex and risky business over the last 20 years?

This gap between knowing the risks and not addressing them is usually rationalise by their exasperated response that there isn't to change processes and, often, the team doesn't want to embrace change.

The consequence is that the same pattern of behaviour and results continue. The evidence: conveyancing has represented more than 50% of claims for the last 20 years. If anything, the percentage continues to rise.

Marshall Goldsmith, executive coach to over 150 CEOs notes - “our default response in life is to experience inertia. In other words, our most common everyday process – the thing we do more often than anything else – is to continue to do what we are already doing.”

The longer these important things are put off and or avoided, the easier it becomes to stay in the groove of the existing rather than step out in do what is required.

And yet for some firms that do take action the sense of progress, breakthrough and results are ultimately rewarding.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...