Skip to main content

The Conveyancing Portal - Reducing Your Risk Footprint

By
As businesses go, conveyancing is perceived as high risk, topping the list of claims in the professional indemnity insurance and the compensation fund. The upshot is that firms engaged in conveyancing have a higher chance of being rated as a high-risk for SRA supervision and monitoring.
 
For that reason, alone, conveyancing firms need to be able to provide evidence and an audit trail of compliance.  And with outcome-focused regulation, robust processes and systems need to be in place to manage risk and deter fraud.    

So, it's against this backdrop that the Law Society are designing a conveyancing portal to reduce the strain and hassle of reducing the size of a firm's risk footprint. The portal, it is claimed, will over time provide verifiable evidence and assurance to lenders and PII insurers that a firm follows best practice and manages risk and performance effectively. 

And while precise details are yet to be disclosed, the Law Society maintain that compliance risk management will be embedded and integrated across the portal to reflect the requirements of industry regulators and key stakeholders.  

Peter Rodd, Chair of the Property Section of the Law Society said recently "The portal is a significant step on the path to achieving the core objectives of the CQS, to create a trusty community of conveyancers, modernize conveyancing, and to deter fraud."

All very commendable but it begs the question: What has CQS done to-date as far as these core objectives are concerned?

From here, it looks like the above statement is as much an admission of CQS underachievement as it is an expression of intention. 

With lenders gravitating towards the Lender Exchange, rather than waiting for the conveyancing portal to materialize, the Law Society is in danger of appearing like the boy who cried "wolf".
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more