Skip to main content

Client Care 101: Advising on What You Don't Advise On

The second part of Client Care 101 illustrates the importance of what you say in your retainer letter or in your ROT (or preferably both).

Solicitor Justin from firm ABC receives a call from Mr. Green who asks for a quote on a purchase. During the conversation Mr. Green talks about how it is his dream home but requires a lot of building work as they are intending to carry out a large double storey side extension.

Mr. Green mentioned that his advisers were in discussions with the council and had already had plans drawn up. Justin assumed therefore assumed that Mr. Green had an architect or planning expert on the case. Justin was proud of himself in winning the instruction  and sent Mr. Green the standard client care letter.

The purchase went through smoothly. But, imagine Justin’s surprise when six months later Mr. Green came back to him complaining that planning permission has been refused arguing that he would never have bought the house had he known that planning permission would not be granted.

Imagine if the retainer letter and Report on Title (ROT) had included something like, “I understand that you have planning experts and an architect to advise on the likelihood of obtaining planning permission for your proposed extension , and therefore this retainer does not include advice on planning matters.” or possibly a more generic catch all paragraph saying that the firms does not cover such advice.  Even in the unlikely event the client had still tried to bring a claim, Justin would surely have a strong reference that checking the planning aspect was not within the remit of his advice.

I am making mention here of the ROT as the scope of the retainer may change over the course of the deal and the ROT affords you that last opportunity to redefine the retainer. This is why some firms take the opportunity to resend the equivalent of ROT even on a sale file.  One needs to have a mindset of the retainer as a living document rather than an administrative job completed as soon as the physical file is created.

As if negligence claim is not bad enough the new regulatory regime of outcome-focused regulation where managing client’s expectations is so important means that, now more than ever, client take-on procedure and sophisticated retainer letters should be central to your risk management.

Never, never fall in the trap of thinking that your retainer letter is a static precedent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FCA AML Audit: Financial Regulator Takes Over Legal Oversight!

The UK government has dropped a regulatory bombshell that will fundamentally reshape your life, and yes, we are talking about the dreaded FCA AML audit. For years, you’ve been supervised by your legal peers, the SRA, but those days of relative comfort are drawing to a close. The big news? Responsibility for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) supervision for the legal and accountancy sectors is being handed over to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA. That's right, the same folks who put the fear of God into the big banks are now coming for your conveyancing files. Cue the dramatic music. What does the FCA take-over actually mean? Forget the gentle nudge; prepare for the financial services full-body search. An FCA AML audit is likely to look a lot more like a detailed financial inspection and a lot less like a polite chat with the SRA. Think maximum emphasison: Ironclad AML documentation (no more "it's in my head" polici...

December 2025: The SRA’s AML Audit Crackdown Has Arrived

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) isn't sending Christmas cards this year. They're sending in the AML auditors. Despite the upcoming shift where the FCA will assume wider AML regulatory oversight, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is turning up the heat one last time. Forget a gentle warning—welcome to the AML Blitz of December 2025 . Let’s cut to the chase. SRA Chief Executive Paul Philip is clearly done with excuses. His public message is unambiguous: "We are still finding fairly basic deficiencies in AML arrangements within firms." Translation for the Partners: You might effortlessly navigate a complex, multi-million-pound merger, but somehow, you still haven't nailed your fundamental firm-wide risk assessment. The era of the gentle wrist-slap is officially over. The SRA has made it clear that fines are "continually going up." AML Compliance is no longer a 'nice-to-have'—it’s an expensive, enforced reality...

FCA AML Audit: Why Solicitors Time to Rethink AML Compliance

If you’re a partner or a compliance officer at a law firm, I want you to take a quick second and think about your last AML review. Was it a check the box exercise to keep the SRA happy? If the answer is yes, we need to have a serious chat. The regulatory landscape for solicitors is shifting fast . The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is stepping onto the field with a much more active role, and they play a much tougher game than we've seen in the past. Today, we’re breaking down why the FCA AML Audit is the new essential safeguard—and why "good enough" policies just won't cut it anymore. Why the "Old Way" of AML is Riskier Than Ever Historically, many of us approached AML compliance through a traditional SRA lens. But let’s be real: that approach is becoming a major liability. The FCA’s style is risk-based, evidence-focused, and—most importantly outcome-driven. They don’t just want to see your manual; they want to see your proof. ...