Skip to main content

Concerns Raised by Law Society Over Lloyds Conveyancing Panel Conditions

By
Lloyds has upped the ante for its conveyancing  panel members and The Law Society of Scotland doesn’t like it.
What Decision First, the Lloyds Conveyancing Panel Manager, has done is made the simple act of acting for any mortgage lender in the Lloyds Banking Group an assumed acceptance of the lender’s Terms. Only nonacceptance required to be communicated along with return of any instructions. In other words, you’re in until and unless you actively opt out.
The Scottish Law Society is concerned that one of the conditions provides a right to Lloyds Banking Group to inspect all conveyancing documents and files relating to transactions carried out on behalf of any lender within the Lloyds group. The Society's concern is that this wording may set up a contractual obligation that might not otherwise apply. If a solicitor was to refuse access to all files where this term has been accepted there might be a difficulty in defending an action for access to the files either on a contractual basis or in terms of Section 1 of the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1972 even though separate files had been established as to what belongs to the borrower client as opposed to the lender.
Another concern is that the Terms require the provision of information about the firm and its employees as may reasonably be required by Lloyds Banking Group . This could prove problematic in relation to credit checks and searches against current employees. I would certainly be interested to hear from employment lawyers as to whether there are any employment issues here. The ex-lawyer in me would force me to take a close look whether a firm’s employment contract allows for such checks to be made in order to be on lender panels or accreditation schemes.
The conditions also allow for Lloyds Banking Group to change the Terms from time to time subject to at least 14 days' notice.
The Professional Practice Committee of the Scottish Law Society have urged all solicitors on the Lloyds conveyancing panel of the need to consider carefully the implications of the terms of membership, particularly given the assumption of tacit or implied acceptance.
Perhaps Lloyds need to consider the benefit of these onerous conditions with the cost of a smaller number of solicitors on its panel.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more