Skip to main content

Latest HSBC CML Handbook Change will Have Conveyancers Tied up in Knots

By
What should otherwise be a simple ”yes-or no” question instead stands as just the latest example of how lenders use the CML Handbook to heap more complex and onerous obligations on their conveyancing panel lawyers.

But, since nothing is ever simple when it comes to CML Handbook compliance, the question “Does the lender want to receive environmental or contaminated land reports?” is the jumping off point for HSBC to shoehorn in obligations that encroach upon what would normally expect of a surveyor. 

So, rather than “yes” or “no”, HSBC’s answer reads as follows:

Japanese Knotweed - You will need to advise the Bank if you become aware that there may be Japanese Knotweed on or near the property and if not already done so we will instruct a valuer, who will follow the RICS guidelines to assess the risk where the weed has been identified on or near the property (generally within 7 metres) . Where Japanese Knotweed is identified we will only lend if there is a treatment schedule and a completion certificate that confirms the weed has been remediated with a guarantee in place for a minimum of 10 years. These documents need to be submitted to the Bank for consideration.


 I am particularly alarmed by the potential broad meaning of the phrase ‘if you become aware that there may be Japanese Knotweed ’ .This is very large hook on which to hang a potential claim in the future if it can be argued that you should have been aware of the problem. Is it not too large a leap to say that a lawyer is now expected to ask the buyer a specific question in this regard if the new protocol forms are not used?

Whilst the TA6 Law Society property information form (3rd edition) does include a question about knotweed,  it is very common for the vendor to answer ‘not known’. By virtue of the seller saying ‘not known’ you fall within the trap of the Part 2 wording ‘there may be’. Surely in such cases conveyancers have to refer the  matter back to the valuer or lender?  

Lenders have previously looked to their valuers to address this issue. In recent years, building societies such as Skipton and Leeds declined mortgage applications on properties where Japanese knotweed was present. Others such as Barclays Bank and Santander, will decline them unless work is undertaken to remove it. Now the conveyancer has to focus his or her attention on knotweed as a CML Handbook requirement. The likelihood is that other lenders will follow HSBC’s move.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more