Skip to main content

Lender Updates Leasehold Policy

MPowered Mortgages are the latest lender to update there P2 policy relating to leasehold. In a change to 5.14.9 the lender’s new requirements states:

“If the proposed security is a new, qualifying long residential leasehold property, covered by the obligations laid down in the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rents) Act 2022 you must check:

  • that the ground rent is no more than “one peppercorn per year” or “peppercorn rent”; and
  • that there are adequate provisions for repairs, maintenance, insurance etc. and an adequate maintenance charge.

If the proposed security is not a new, qualifying long residential leasehold property within scope of the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rents) Act 2022:
Peppercorn or low ground rents are acceptable.

In respect of RPI linked Ground rents:

  • Ground rent is indexed to RPI no more frequently than every 5 years.
  • Ground rent up to 0.1% of the current market value is acceptable. If the ground rent is over £250 (or £1,000 in London) or will end up over these figures in the future the property is unacceptable under the Housing Act 1988 In order to proceed a Deed of Variation eliminating this risk must be obtained prior to completion.
  • We may accept Ground rent up to 0.2% of the current market value subject to review and where this is the case you should refer the matter to us to provide confirmation of whether we are happy to proceed,

In respect of Doubling ground rents:

  • Should not double more frequently than every 20 years
  • Ground rent up to 0.1% of the current market value is acceptable. If the ground rent is over £250 (or £1,000 in London) or will end up over these figures in the future the property is unacceptable under the Housing Act 1988 In order to proceed a Deed of Variation eliminating this risk must be obtained prior to completion.
  • We may accept Ground rent up to 0.2% of the current market value subject to review and where this is the case you should refer the matter to us to provide confirmation of whether we are happy to proceed,

In respect of Fixed ground rent:

  • These are acceptable up to 0.1% of the current market value. If the ground rent is over £250 (or £1,000 in London) or will end up over these figures in the future the property is unacceptable under the Housing Act 1988 In order to proceed a Deed of Variation eliminating this risk must be obtained prior to completion.
  • We may accept ground rent of up to 0.2% of the current market value subject to review and where this is the case you should refer the matter to us to provide confirmation of whether we are happy to proceed

In respect of Open Market Value linked ground rents:

  • These are not acceptable and should be referred to us as soon as identified

Where the management company is not owned by the homeowners covered by the estate rent charge, a maximum cap of 0.1% of the market value of the property, or £1,000, whichever is the lower applies. Increase mechanism limiting any rises to a government index measure for inflation (e.g., RPI or other similar index) is required for the case to be considered.

N.B. The ground rent and services charges combined must not exceed 1.5% of the property valuation.

Please refer back to us the amount and the nature of the estate charge. Please also refer to Section 5.15.2a”

Law firm with the relevant accreditation should take into account changes to leasehold requirements when updating their CQS Purchase of a Leasehold Policy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

FCA AML Audit: The SRA Is Out, the FCA Is In

For years, law firms prepared for AML scrutiny with one regulator in mind: the SRA. That era is over. The UK Government has confirmed a fundamental shift in supervision. AML and counter-terrorist financing oversight is moving from the SRA to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This is not a cosmetic change. It is a full regulatory reset. If your firm is still thinking in terms of an internal review, an FCA AML audit will feel very different, financially, operationally, and reputationally. What Makes an FCA AML Audit Different The SRA regulates professional standards. The FCA enforces financial crime controls. That distinction matters. An FCA AML audit is not designed to guide or educate. It is designed to assess risk to the financial system and determine whether enforcement action is required. This is precisely why firms can no longer rely on internal reviews alone. An FCA AML audit will expect to see independent challenge, most ...