Skip to main content

Does a Friday Fraud start with a Spoof Sale Memorandum ?


Conveyancing fraud is on the rise and the consequences for victims are devastating and often life-changing. It is a major concern for law firms and PI Insurers alike.  

New figures show that the rewards for the gangs are potentially huge, with each successful scam worth on average more than £112,000. It is believed that fraudsters are currently carrying out two successful conveyancing frauds a week, earning them in the region of £225,000 a week.

The criminals hack into the email chains between sellers and buyers and their solicitors and estate agents. The fraudsters then send an email – usually on the day of sale completion – informing the parties that bank account details have changed at the last minute and that money should be deposited in a different account.

Lexsure have some interesting thoughts on how some criminal gangs may be starting the ‘phishing’ process and accessing email accounts in order to ultimately commit their crime.

Conveyancing lawyers frequently receive a sales memorandum by email. I would anticipate that the vast majority of conveyancing transactions include the receipt of sales memorandum and then follow up with a contract package all sent as email attachments.

Lexsure have reason to believe that firms are being sent what appears to be legitimate emails attaching a contract package or other ‘early stage’ documents such as a sales memorandum.

The emails that I have seen show the logo and name of legitimate law firm. They are very convincing. The wording for one email is as follows:

[subject line: Sales Memorandum]

Dear Sirs,
We refer to the above and following receipt of the sales memorandum we now enclose our contract documentation for your attention and approval.
I look forward to hearing from you with any enquiries as soon as you are able so we may proceed further in this matter.
If you have any queries then please do not hesitate to contact me further on the details below.
Kind Regards.

One clue that this is a ‘spoof email’  is the fact that the email is sent from a Gmail account. The reason for this is that the email is less likely to be caught by the recipient’s spam filters. Lexsure have been in touch with Google to inform them of the ‘phishing emails’ that we have seen.

Note the filename suffix of the attachment is .pdf.htm. HTML attachments are rare, and no legitimate attachment has a .pdf.htm suffix.  The file, when downloaded and run from the desktop will be executed by the web browser (typically Internet Explorer or Chrome).  It impersonates a password-protected PDF file  like so:

  1. The web page first pops up a dialog box :
2) And then displays the fake document, designed to create the illusion of a password-protected PDF document.


The user is prompted to enter their email address and a password.  If they click “View Document” the user’s credentials are shipped to the attacker’s server (in this case, at an ISP in Kentucky).

Now that the attacker has the user’s credentials, they may wreak havoc.

Lessons to be learnt :


  • Be extremely cautious about opening what appear to be standard documents in the conveyancing process. Examples may be Sales Memorandums, Contract packages, Redemption Statements etc. If unsure phone the sender and make further enquiries.
  • Be sure that the sender's email comes from a known recognised domain rather than a public email provider such as Gmail, AOL, Yahoo etc .
  • Do not input your email address and password in order to open up an attachment.
  • COMPLETIONmonitor users who have concerns about the legitimacy of an email may forward it to the support team at support@lexsure.com to conduct a safety check.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...