Skip to main content

Will stamp duty changes create problems for conveyancing lawyers?

In the 2015 Autumn Statement, George Osborne announced higher rates of stamp duty on the purchase of additional properties, such as buy-to-lets and second homes. The government is currently consulting on the practicalities of how the 3% stamp duty hike will work and is seeking responses from conveyancers. The deadline for the consultation is 1st February 2016 in order for the government to announce the new regime in the upcoming Budget.
Conveyancing lawyers are asked to respond to the following questions:
  • Do you think that purchasers are more likely to give accurate answers to main residence questions if HMRC provides specific questions for the conveyancer to ask the purchaser?
  • Would a formal declaration by the purchaser that the answers to any such questions are accurate help to increase compliance without creating undue burdens for conveyancers? How do you think such a declaration should work?
  • Besides normal publicly available guidance, are there any additional products that HMRC can provide to help purchasers understand what rates of tax they will be paying on a planned purchase?

In order to administer and ensure compliance with the new higher rates, changes will be required to the existing SDLT return.
Taxpayers will have to specify that a given transaction is for an additional residential property. This will leave the SDLT return with four categories of property: residential property, non-residential property, mixed, and residential – additional property.
The government recognises that the higher rates of SDLT will create additional requirements for agents acting for purchasers. The government expects most of the additional information that needs to be obtained from purchasers will be straightforward and uncontroversial.
For example, questions about whether the purchaser (or any joint purchaser) will own more than one residential property at the end of the day of the transaction will need to be considered. This information will need to be kept up to date by the purchaser and the conveyancer during the period between instruction and completion.
One piece of information which will be required from purchasers is whether any newly purchased residential property will be a main residence and replacing a previous main residence. This would be required in a situation where a purchaser with multiple properties at the end of the day of a transaction would not pay the higher rates.
In order to determine this, agents will need to determine whether the purchaser has disposed of any residential property within 18 months of the new transaction and whether or not that disposal was a disposal of the purchaser’s only or main residence.
Ultimate responsibility for the accuracy of an SDLT return remains with the purchaser and HMRC will provide guidance on how purchasers can determine whether the disposal of a property can be considered as a disposal of a main residence. Yet these days many law firms complete the return forms on behalf of clients. Is that set to continue given the additional complexity and risk?
Conveyancers may not be best placed to judge whether a purchaser is correct about which property has been their main home. The government recognises that conveyancers are a key part of ensuring SDLT compliance and are keen to maintain this.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...