Skip to main content

SRA AML Audit Results in £23k fine

A CQS accredited firm operating from two small offices in the south west has been hit with a £23,000 fine for failing to comply with AML regulations. Lexsure has announced a tenfold increase in weekly enquiries concerning their AML audit solutions since this fine was announced.

CQS firm Batchelor Sharp was issued with the sanction – almost the maximum the SRA can impose – despite there being no evidence any harm caused. It is not clear whether the firm had an adequate CQS AML Policy.

The SRA said it had carried out a desk-based AML audit at the firm March 2023 to assess compliance with the regulations from 2017. Five conveyancing matter were found with no client matter risk assessments (CMRA). The firm accepted it had not completed any such CMRAs on files prior to March 2023.

The SRA said the breach of AML regulatory obligations had persisted for ‘longer than was reasonable’ and demonstrated a ‘pattern of non-compliance’. The firm’s conduct, it was stated, had the potential to cause serious harm to the public interest and to public confidence in the legal profession.

Some might reasonably point out that If the SRA levy a nearon maximum fine for to this firm, where is the room for the SRA manoeuvre when they encounter more serious cases?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...