Skip to main content

CoT Submissions for LBG (Scotland)

Following last week’s Budget announcements the temporary Stamp Duty waiver for properties will be extended to the End of June for properties in England/Wales and Northern Ireland.  The existing waiver for Scotland will cease at the end of March.

LBG still anticipate a large increase in queries and completion related activity for the March month end period, as a result the deadline date of 24th March for Certificate of title submission will still apply.

To ensuring funds are available for completion firms in Scotland must ensure that they submit their CoT through Lender Exchange (for cases received via Lender Exchange). Using the online portal will also allow the firm to track progress of your CoT submission. In this way the firm will receive an update once the CoT has been accepted .

The pre-populated PDF CoT in the offer pack will soon be removed entirely, and in order to ensure the process is smooth, it’s vital that all CoTs are submitted using the Lender Exchange Submit CoT button, and from the end of the month, any CoT not submitted via Lender Exchange (for cases received via Lender Exchange) will be rejected.

Key reminders:

  • Certificates of Title should be submitted by the 24th March to ensure completion by Month end.
  • Requests for Completion (CoTs) should be submitted via Lender Exchange. We will be monitoring CoT’s received and any requests received on paper/fax that should have come through Lender Exchange will be rejected.
  • 5 Days’ Notice is required for all completion requests, requests submitted inside this 5 day period will be processed on a best endeavours basis.
  • Do not submit a request for funds if you have outstanding matters that still require attention, issues need resolved prior to COT submission. 
  • For cases issued via Lender Exchange, CoT’s should not be submitted by e-mail unless you have been formally requested to do so. Please check Lender Exchange for completion status rather than calling us.
  • During busy periods LBG see an increase in volumes of returned mortgage advance payments. Please be aware that LBG require a minimum of 48 hours for funds to be re-released once returned, please consider if the initial completion dates are viable before submitting your COT.
  • Solicitors should carefully check the lender handbook for what account to return funds to, we are seeing an increased number of scenarios where they are sending funds to the wrong place (e.g. sending to old A/ account which is now closed, sending 60/ funds back to the 2002 account details), please ensure these are returned to the correct account to avoid delays.
  • For cash incentives alteration, it is only necessary to contact LBG if the value of the cash incentive declared increases from the amount already notified to us, as detailed within the mortgage offer. For example - Where the incentive reduces, is removed or the structure of the incentive changes there is no need to notify us, providing it does not exceed the amount already advised to us.  Information for conveyancers can be found in Section 6.4.4 of the UK Finance Handbook which identifies in which scenarios a conveyancer needs or does not need to report changes to the bank, and this does not alter that advice. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...