Skip to main content

No Time for Checklists

An early mentor of mine had a framed print hanging behind his desk showing a Victorian-era solicitor with a client and below it was written: “A lawyer’s time is his stock in trade”.

Time is money. Yet I often find it odd, when talking with conveyancing lawyers (as opposed to practice managers or COLPs) about pre-completion checklists, they tell me “we are so busy… we simply don’t have the time.”

What they mean is that they don’t think the checklist is important enough. It’s not high priority, profitable or urgent enough to change their processes. Yet, as with most of us, they do have the time to consult Facebook and Twitter. Those activities are important enough.

Where did that time come from?

What did we do before social media was here?

Weren't we busy five years ago?

That conveyancers manage to do conveyancing without a comprehensive checklist system is beyond me. Despite what the public may think, conveyancing is fraught with  complexity. There are a thousand ways things can and do go wrong. The volume of insurance claims is proof.

When Harvard’s Atul Gwande introduced his checklist for surgery, a significant number of his medical peers told him “this is a waste of my time”. However, when asked, “If you were to have an operation, would you want the checklist?”, 94% wanted it.

Of course,  conveyancing is not a life or death situation and comparing a surgery checklist to a comprehensive, dynamic conveyancing checklist may be over the top. However, please permit me to ask the following question to those who don’t have time for checklists:

If your employment contract held you personally liable for the cost of conveyancing errors or the cost of the differential in the increase in insurance premium as a result of an error, would you find the time to use a comprehensive conveyancing checklist?

Don’t answer too quickly.  Take your time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...