Skip to main content

The Green Deal ; Yet another example of the 'complexity creep' in conveyancing


On Monday 28th January the government formally launched the Green Deal scheme following its inception in October 2012. The intention behind the legislation is to improve the energy efficiency of the property stock in the UK. I have been asked by a number of conveyancing solicitors about what additional responsibilities there are for conveyancers during the process of selling or buying a property which has been subject to a Green Deal.

By way of background, the Green Deal enables homeowners and others to take out long-term loans to fund energy-efficient home improvement projects such as the installation of loft insulation, solar panels and new boilers. The loan is paid back through the electricity bills for a period of up to 25 years.

Under the scheme approved Energy Assessors will attend the property to assess its energy efficiency and make recommendations on potential improvements, such recommendations taking into account not only the design and age of the property but also the householders’ energy use habits. The homeowner will then be in a position to provide the report to an approved Green Deal Provider who will implement the recommendations and install the appropriate energy-saving measures. The 'golden rule'  is that the loan repayments should be lower than the anticipated savings in energy costs. However, this may not always be the case because different occupiers will use different amounts of fuel.

The debt is effectively attached to the electricity supply of the property. It is not a legal charge (it is an unsecured loan regulated under the Consumer Credit Act) and it is not the personal obligation of the person commissioning the works. If they move the 'benefits' and the debt stay with the property.

The main impact for conveyancing solicitors will arise on the transfer and/or charge of a property when the property has installations that have been financed under the scheme.


Terms and Conditions  and Estimates

Consider changing your Terms and Conditions to cater for the Green Deal. First, make it clear that the obligation rests the seller to disclose whether a Green Deal as applicable to the property. Set out the legal obligations of disclose and the implications of failure. If you have an instruction form add a question as to whether the property is subject to a Green Deal.  As the conveyancing will inevitably be more complex where there is a Green Deal do consider whether you want to reserve the right to charge additional fees. If you have an on-line fee calculator perhaps you can ask the appropriate question and therefore disclose your additional fee

Acting for Sellers

Sellers of properties subject to the Green Deal will be under a duty to disclose the scheme to prospective buyers at least seven days before exchange of contracts and to secure the acknowledgement of the buyer or tenant that they will be bound by the plan.The responsibility for communicating that information rests with the seller or landlord. Agents can fulfil that role; however they are not liable for the responsibility. The buyer will then be required to formally acknowledge that the Deal has been disclosed to them and that they will be bound by the terms of the agreement made between the Buyer and the Green Deal Provider.

If the seller (being the original bill payer) fails to give necessary disclosure they may have to repay the value of the loan (and interest).  The purchaser or tenant (if they have not received the necessary disclosure) may challenge the obligation to repay the loan.  They must do so within 90 days of notification by the energy provider that the Green Deal affects the property.  This action by the purchaser would leave the debt with the outgoing seller.

Acting for the Buyer

Precedent documents will need to be amended to reflect the changes, in particular the Contract for Sale, Reports on Title, Lease and License, and advice will need to be provided to buyers in understanding the terms of the Green Deal as part of the usual title investigations.

Whilst it important to make sure that the investigative work about any Green Deal is covered I would include a paragraph (as a fallback position) within the ROT making sure that the buyer gets in touch with you if they receive any bill one they move in which indicates a Green Deal being in place - point to the fact that there is a 90 day limitation period to push the debt back to the seller. I would not consider it overkill in your letter confirming completion to reiterate the necessity to check the utility bills and reinforcing the 90 day limitation period (obviously such paragraphs should be deleted if the where the Green Deal has been identified as part of the conveyancing process).

The ROT should also set out the disclosure obligations should the buyer decide to let out the property.

As a buyer’s conveyancer you need to ensure that your client understands the terms of the agreement, but you will also want confirmation that all appropriate building regulations and, in certain circumstances, planning obligations have been fulfilled by the scheme provider as required under the Deal. For certain properties restrictive covenant consent or the a license for alteration from a landlord or freeholder may also have been needed. Please also note that if part of the work involves a lease of the roof for solar panels there will be CML handbook requirements to consider.

If you would like to see precedent wording to go in your Terms and Conditions, Reports, Sale Contract and other appropriate documents please contact me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...