Skip to main content

The December 2025 AML Crackdown: Is Your Firm Next?

By
The first half of December 2025 sent a blunt warning to the legal profession: the SRA will not accept poor AML compliance. A number of enforcement actions has resulted in thousands of pounds in fines for technical failings. In short, you don’t have to launder cash to be penalised—poor record-keeping will do the job.

The Case Files: December Enforcement

  • West Yorkshire (Mirfield) | Published: Dec 1, 2025. The firm was fined £6,236 for a seven-year gap in Firm-Wide Risk Assessments. The SRA cited a persistent disregard for statutory obligations, noting the firm failed to maintain compliant AML policies since 2017.
  • Manchester (Swinton) | Published: Dec 10, 2025. The practice was fined £19,013 following an inspection that found systemic failures in internal AML controls. While the firm had AML policies on paper, they were not being applied effectively at the client matter risk assessment level.
  • Gloucestershire (Stonehouse) | Published: Dec 11, 2025.A fine for £8,426 for failing to conduct Client and Matter Risk Assessments on the majority of files reviewed. The firm was found to be using a generic template that did not address the specific risks of their practice.
  • Oldham (Lancashire) | Published: Dec 11, 2025.A firm was hit with a fine of £11,271 for failing to establish and maintain fully compliant policies and controls over an eight-year period. The SRA noted that the absence of these controls created a potential for harm to the public interest.
  • Surrey (Reigate) | Published: Dec 12, 2025. £2,987 fine for failing to update AML policies and FWRA between 2017 and 2025. Although the firm admitted the breaches early, the SRA emphasised that compliance documents must remain current to be effective.

    The AML Reality Check: It is Strict Liability Now

    The SRA are looking for firms unprepared. Nearly every fine this month was triggered by three core failures:

    • Missing or incomplete Firm-Wide Risk Assessments (FWRA).
    • Reliance on generic templates that were not tailored to the firm's specific work.
    • Outdated AML policies that had not been reviewed or updated for several years.
    The Verdict: If your FWRA is gathering dust or your Client Matter Risk Assessments are one-size-fits-all, you are sitting on a regulatory time bomb.

    Is your firm SRA AML audit-ready? These cases prove that the SRA is shifting from checking for existence to testing for effectiveness. Proactive compliance is now the only way to avoid the crackdown trend.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more