Skip to main content

Why Every Law Firm Needs an Independent AML Audit—Before It’s Too Late

By

If you run a law firm, you already know that AML compliance isn't optional—it's a regulatory necessity. But here’s the real question: When was the last time your firm had an independent AML audit?

With the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) cracking down on AML compliance and the Legal Sector Affinity Group (LSAG) tightening its guidelines, law firms can no longer afford to overlook independent AML audits. The reality is simple: if you haven’t had an independent AML audit recently, your firm could already be at risk.

What Is an Independent AML Audit, and Why Does Your Firm Need One?

An independent AML audit is a critical review of your firm’s anti-money laundering policies, risk assessments, controls, and procedures. The key word here is independent—meaning it must be conducted by someone outside your AML compliance team.

Why is this so important? Because the SRA expects law firms to take AML compliance seriously, and that means ensuring your internal processes are being properly scrutinised by an objective expert.

A well-conducted independent AML audit not only helps you stay compliant but also:

  • Identifies weaknesses before regulators do.
  • Prevents fines and penalties from non-compliance.
  • Demonstrates your firm’s commitment to AML best practices.
  • Reduces risks associated with money laundering threats.

What Does an Independent AML Audit Cover?

An independent AML audit is more than just a compliance check—it’s a deep dive into your firm’s AML framework. A proper audit includes:

  • Reviewing AML policies, training records, FWRA and client matter risk assessments.
  • Testing the effectiveness of your existing AML procedures.
  • Analyzing automated AML compliance systems.
  • Interviewing staff members to assess their knowledge and adherence to procedures.
  • Reviewing files and suspicious activity reports.
  • Providing actionable recommendations to strengthen your compliance approach.

Why Law Firms Struggle With Independent AML Audits

Let’s be honest—many firms know they must have an independent AML audit but keep putting it off. There primary reason is that they dont want to 'lift carpet'

But delaying or failing to have an independent AML audit isn’t the answer. If the SRA knocks on your door tomorrow, will you be confident in your firm’s AML compliance?

Remote or On-Site? Get an Independent AML Audit on Your Terms

Lexsure, are one a number of specialists offering independent AML audits. Most companies conducting independent AML audit aim to ensure that their client firm meets every requirement under the Money Laundering Regulations and LSAG guidance.

Independent AML audits tend to include:

  • A full compliance check covering AML policies, risk controls, and reporting procedures.
  • A certificate of compliance to demonstrate due diligence.
  • Clear, practical recommendations to strengthen your AML framework.

Don’t Wait Until It’s Too Late—Book Your Independent AML Audit Today

The SRA isn’t slowing down, and neither should you. If your firm hasn’t had an independent AML audit recently, now is the time to act.

Avoid the risk of regulatory penalties and get ahead of compliance today. Contact Lexsure to schedule your independent AML audit—remote or in-office.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more