Skip to main content

Oxfordshire lawyer to be Prosecuted by SDT for AML Concerns

By

The SRA has referred an Oxfordshire a lawyer to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for prosecution. The Tribunal certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which include that the lawyer :-

1. Between around January 2020 and July 2022, failed to keep and maintain accurate accounting records for the Firm. 

2. From around January 2020 to July 2022, caused or allowed a client account shortage on the Firm’s client account. 

3. From June 2017 to around October 2022, failed to have in place: 

3.1 An AML Firm Wide Risk Assessment (‘FWRA’) as required by Regulation 18 of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (‘MLRs 2017’);

3.2 Anti-money Laundering Policies, Controls and Procedures (‘AML Policies’) as required by Regulation 19 of the MLRs 2017. 

4. On or around 12 December 2019, made a declaration to the SRA which was false and misleading in that it confirmed that the Firm had in place a fully compliant FWRA as required by regulation 18 of the MLRs 2017 when, in fact, there was no such FWRA in place. 

5. Between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2022, and in relation to the purchase of a property by Client A, caused or allowed the Firm to fail to comply with the MLRs 2017 in that the Firm: 

5.1. Failed to conduct adequate client due diligence (‘CDD’) measures as required by Regulation 28 of the MLRs 2017; 

5.2. Failed to apply enhanced due diligence (‘EDD’) as required by Regulation 33 of the MLRs 2017;

The allegations are subject to a hearing before the SDT and, as at today’s date are unproven. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more