Skip to main content

AML compliance during SRA crackdown

By

Recent SRA AML audits reveals a pattern of non-compliance with AML obligations among many firms. With this concern in focus, the SRA is contemplating fixed penalties for non-compliance. Law firms must now review and update AML processes diligently to avoid disciplinary measures, reputational harm, and hefty penalties.

This comes at a time when the SRA are carrying out an extensive and ongoing programme of audits into firms’ AML compliance. This includes desk-based AML assessments as well as targeted, in-depth onsite inspections.

  • If the firm should take on the relevant client or matter.
  • The level of due diligence to be conducted – where there is a situation that presents a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, then enhanced due diligence (EDD) may need to be conducted.
  • Any other steps that should be taken to mitigate the risks posed.

Firms are mandated to have a written and bespoke fimwide risk assessment (FWRA). They must also have a complete and documented client and matter risk assessment (CMRA) carried out by the relevant fee earner to determine.

I am hearing a lot of disgruntled voices by law firms concerning SRA audits. As legal professionals one should have ability to research law, regulation, practice and procedures. The 2017 Regulations (as amended) are freely available online as is the Legal Sector Affinity Group guidance. There plent of guidance and support on the SRA website. If you don’t have the time or inclination to put things in order – engage the services an AML compliance consultant to help you meet what are government’s – not the SRA’s – requirements. There is SRA vendetta against the profession.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argie Bargie over Home Information Packs

By
In response to a question from Conservative MP David Amess on what methodology would be used to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Information Pack programme, Communities and Local Government Minister Ian Austin was involved in heated argument. The wording of the debate ( reported in Hansard ) makes interesting reading, so I thought I would share it with you : Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What methodology his Department plans to use to evaluate the effectiveness of the home information pack programme; and if he will make a statement. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local...
Post a Comment
Read more

Paperwork is not a shield: Why your SRA aml audit demands more than just a dusty manual

By
The Solicitors Regulation Authority continues its aggressive crackdown on financial crime with a recent fine issued against Whiteheads Solicitors (Staffordshire) Ltd . This decision serves as a stark reminder that the regulator is looking far beyond simple paperwork during an SRA aml audit . The firm was fined 2,584 GBP plus 600 GBP in costs following an investigation into its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. While the firm had a firm-wide risk assessment and general policies in place, the SRA identified critical failures at the matter level. Key compliance failures included: Failure to conduct adequate client and matter risk assessments . The SRA found a consistent pattern where the firm failed to sufficiently assess client matter risk levels as required by Regulation 28. Inadequate scrutiny of source of funds . In one specific property transaction, the firm failed to properly investigate the origin of funds provided by ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Street Practitioner’s Guide to Surviving the FCA

By
For a sole practitioner or the MLRO in a small high-street firm, "AML compliance" often feels like just another mountain of paperwork standing between you and your actual work. When you are juggling a heavy conveyancing caseload, a sensitive probate matter, and the day-to-day survival of your practice, the last thing you need is a new regulator with a reputation for being data-heavy and "zero-tolerance." But the ground is shifting. As the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over AML supervision from the SRA, the "high-street way" of doing things—relying on long-standing local reputations and gut instinct—is being replaced by a requirement for hard, documented proof. The end of "I’ve known them for years" In a small town, you often act for the same families for generations. You know their business, their parents, and their reputation. Under the old mindset, that felt like enough. Under the FCA, it isn’t. T...
Post a Comment
Read more