The recent review of the conveyancing sector by the Solicitors Regulation Authority found that 23 percent of conveyancing firms are inadequately advising leasehold homebuyers. In what the SRA describes as a 'dangerous assumption', several firms said that they saw no reason to explain the difference between freehold and leasehold, assuming the client would already know or the estate agent would have already explained it. Ultimately this leads to the question as to whether the solicitors have breached their duty of care. As a result of the SRA's review, six law firms have been referred to the regulator's internal disciplinary processes. No doubt these firms will have their Reports on Title scrutinised. Regarding leasehold advice, the SRA report found: Nearly a quarter of firms did not explain the difference between freehold and leasehold properties, with some relying on the client’s knowledge or information provided by an estate agent. One out of five people who...
This blog is for CQS accredited firms in England and Wales. Including topics like the Conveyancing process, Conveyancing Policy Templates and Conveyancing case law. As it contains everything about conveyancing and conveyancers it should be of particular interest to property lawyers and property solicitors, as well as COLP and Compliance Managers.