About Conveyancing

Client and Matter Risk Assessments for Conveyancers

Effective client and matter risk assessments should explain the risks, inform due diligence and remain under review as a transaction develops. Explore practical guidance for conveyancers on risk ratings, mitigation, approvals and recording decisions. Discover how Lexsure’s CDDmonitor can support a structured digital CMRA process, tailored to your firm’s risks and procedures.

Does your CMRA explain the risk and what happens next?

A completed form or selected risk rating does not, by itself, demonstrate an effective assessment. Your records should explain the risks identified, the measures taken and the reasoning behind the decision to proceed.

CDDmonitor helps conveyancing firms structure and record client and matter risk assessments, with configurable templates, escalation settings and reviews as matters develop.

  • Record the reasoning supporting risk ratings.
  • Tailor questions to your firm-wide risk assessment.
  • Document mitigation measures and configure escalation.
  • Reassess matters when new information emerges.
  • Retain timestamped assessment records for review.

Explore the digital CMRA service and consider how it could support your firm’s assessment, approval and monitoring procedures.

Explore CDDmonitor’s digital CMRA service →

Technology supports the process. Professional judgement and responsibility for AML compliance remain with your firm.

  • Your Conveyancing AML Policy Quotes the Law. Does It Explain the Job

    The article emphasizes the need for tailored anti-money laundering (AML) documentation within conveyancing firms, highlighting gaps between policy wording and practical application. It encourages clear procedures that specify roles, actions, and documentation requirements to ensure compliance and effective monitoring. Independent audits can help address discrepancies in understanding and implementation of AML processes.

    Read full article →.

  • Does Your AML File Review Actually Test Source of Funds?

    “Source-of-funds documents on file: yes.” What does that answer actually establish? It may confirm that bank statements were collected. It does not explain whether anyone investigated the money’s origin, considered unusual entries or reached a reasoned conclusion about the funds being used for the purchase. The SRA’s guidance on AML policies, controls and procedures, published…

    Read full article →.